Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-04-27 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.68 x 2.99 x 0.39 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.94 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Dynamic Grey and Frosted Champagne | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2230 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (360 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a global score of 94.6, which is better than Moto G60's 79.5 overall score. Galaxy Z Fold 2's body is a lot heavier but noticeably thinner than Moto G60, and both of them were released only a few months apart. These phones work with the same Android 11 operating system, so you shouldn't notice any differences regarding that.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a bit faster CPU than Moto G60, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Galaxy Z Fold 2 has just a bit better screen than Moto G60, because although it has a just a little worse display density, it also counts with a better resolution of 1768 x 2208 pixels and a bit larger display.
The Moto G60 has a superior camera than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has worse 30 fps video frame rate and a smaller aperture which is worse for taking images in low light environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Moto G60 also counts with a back-facing camera with a lot higher 108 mega-pixels resolution.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a bit more storage for games and applications than Motorola Moto G60, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. The Moto G60 features improved battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has a 6000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.