Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-04-27 | 2020-05-05 |
| 6.68 x 2.99 x 0.39 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.94 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Dynamic Grey and Frosted Champagne | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2230 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (360 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a global score of 81.1, which is a little bit better than Moto G60's global score of 79.5. Both phones in our current comparison come with Android OS, but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has the previous 10 version while Moto G60 has Android 11. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is an older cellphone than the Moto G60, but Xiaomi made it somewhat thinner and just a little bit lighter anyway.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a little faster processor than Moto G60, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a display that is just as good as the display in Moto G60, although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a little bit smaller screen, a little lower resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a just a bit worse quantity of pixels per display inch.
Moto G60 has a bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal storage, the Moto G60 also has an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro's camera is very similar to the camera in Motorola Moto G60, and although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a back camera with a way lower resolution and a lower 3840x2160 video resolution, they both have the same camera aperture.
The Moto G60 features greater battery life than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity instead of 5020mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.