Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| Android 11 | -- |
| -- | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.68 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.48 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Iced Mint and Ink Blue | Silver and Space gray |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G95 MT6785V/CD chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2050 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MC4 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.09 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The iPhone X has a general score of 88.1, which is better than the Moto G60s's score of 79.9. IPhone X is a a lot thinner and somewhat lighter cellphone than Moto G60s. The iPhone X features a much better screen than Motorola Moto G60s, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a bit better amount of pixels per inch in the display and a bit higher 1125 x 2436 resolution.
The Moto G60s features a quite bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than iPhone X, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB. IPhone X features a superior processing power than Moto G60s, because although it has an inferior number of cores and a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a 64 bits CPU.
The Moto G60s has a much better camera than Apple iPhone X, because although it has lower video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Moto G60s also counts with a back camera with way more MP and a bigger aperture for better images and video in low light situations.
Moto G60s has a much better battery duration than iPhone X, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.