Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| Android 11 | -- |
| -- | 2018-10-26 |
| 6.68 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.48 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Iced Mint and Ink Blue | Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G95 MT6785V/CD chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2050 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MC4 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.09 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The iPhone XR has a global score of 82, which is a bit better than Moto G60s's score of 79.9. The iPhone XR is a a bit lighter and somewhat thinner phone than Moto G60s. The Apple iPhone XR features a little bit better looking display than Moto G60s, although it has a little bit smaller screen, a little bit less pixels per inch in the screen and a way worse 828 x 1792 resolution.
Motorola Moto G60s has a much better storage for apps and games than iPhone XR, because it has a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB and more internal memory. The iPhone XR counts with a faster processor than Motorola Moto G60s, because although it has 1 GB less RAM memory and a lower number of cores , it also counts with a 64 bits processing unit.
Moto G60s counts with a much better battery lifetime than iPhone XR, because it has a 70 percent bigger battery capacity. Moto G60s counts with a superior camera than Apple iPhone XR, because although it has lower 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Moto G60s also counts with a bigger aperture for better photography and video in poorly lited environments and a much more mega-pixels camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.