Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 11 | -- |
| -- | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.68 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.48 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Iced Mint and Ink Blue | Black and Gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G95 MT6785V/CD chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2050 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MC4 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ has a score of 81.3, which is slightly better than Moto G60s's 79.9 score. The LG V35 ThinQ design is a lot lighter and notably thinner than the Moto G60s. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a slightly better display than Motorola Moto G60s, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher pixels density and a better 1440 x 2880 resolution.
Motorola Moto G60s counts with slightly more memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity. LG V35 ThinQ counts with a bit faster processing unit than Motorola Moto G60s, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Motorola Moto G60s has a better camera than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Motorola Moto G60s also counts with a way better resolution camera in the back. The Moto G60s counts with a much better battery duration than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.