Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| -- | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.68 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.48 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Iced Mint and Ink Blue | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G95 MT6785V/CD chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2050 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MC4 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG V40 ThinQ is just a bit better than the Moto G60s, getting a global score of 81.2 against 79.9. Both devices in this comparison use Android operating system, but the LG V40 ThinQ has 10 version while Moto G60s has Android 11. LG V40 ThinQ is a thinner and a lot lighter device than Moto G60s. LG V40 ThinQ features just a bit better screen than Moto G60s, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 3120px resolution and a higher screen density.
The LG V40 ThinQ has a bit superior processing unit than Moto G60s, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the LG V40 ThinQ also has a higher amount of RAM. Moto G60s captures a little bit better photos and videos than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has slower video frame rates and a tinier camera aperture, and they both have the same video quality, the Moto G60s also counts with a back facing camera with much more megapixels.
The Moto G60s has slightly more storage capacity for games and applications than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has a slot for SD memory cards that allows 976 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity. Moto G60s has a much longer battery duration than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.