Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| -- | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.68 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.48 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Iced Mint and Ink Blue | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G95 MT6785V/CD chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2050 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MC4 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A50 is just a bit better than the Moto G60s, with an 83.8 score against 79.9. Samsung Galaxy A50 is a much lighter and a lot thinner phone than Moto G60s. Samsung Galaxy A50 has a slightly better display than Moto G60s, because although it has a little bit smaller screen and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2340px, it also counts with a quite greater display pixel density.
Moto G60s features just a bit more storage for applications and games than Galaxy A50, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Moto G60s also has an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB. Galaxy A50 counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Motorola Moto G60s. Both have the same number of cores and 4 GB of RAM memory.
The Moto G60s counts with a superior camera than Galaxy A50, and although they both have the same camera aperture, the Moto G60s also has a lot better 64 MP resolution back facing camera and a much higher 3840x2160 video definition. Motorola Moto G60s has superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A50, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.