Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-10-20 |
| 6.68 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.48 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Iced Mint and Ink Blue | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G95 MT6785V/CD chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2050 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MC4 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50s has a global score of 86.6, which is just a bit better than the Moto G60s's 79.9 overall score. Both of these phones use Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy A50s has the older 10 version and Moto G60s has Android 11 version. Galaxy A50s's construction is incredibly thinner and way lighter than the Moto G60s.
The Galaxy A50s counts with a bit better processing power than Moto G60s, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy A50s also has 2 GB more RAM memory. The Galaxy A50s has a slightly better looking screen than Moto G60s, because although it has a little smaller screen and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, it also counts with a bit better display density.
Motorola Moto G60s counts with just a bit bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A50s, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the Motorola Moto G60s also has a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 1 TB. Galaxy A50s takes clearer pictures and videos than Moto G60s, although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for low-light photos and videos, a worse 3840x2160 video resolution and a way worse resolution camera.
The Moto G60s counts with greater battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A50s, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.