Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2019-12-27 |
| 6.68 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.48 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Iced Mint and Ink Blue | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G95 MT6785V/CD chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2050 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MC4 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 is a bit better than Moto G60s, with a overall score of 85.5 against 79.9. These phones work with the same Android 11 operating system. Galaxy A51 is a thinner and lighter phone than the Moto G60s. Galaxy A51 features a bit better processing power than Moto G60s. They have 8 CPU cores and 4 GB of RAM memory.
Galaxy A51 counts with a bit more vivid screen than Moto G60s, because although it has a little smaller screen and a little lower 1080 x 2400px resolution, it also counts with a little better screen pixel density. The Samsung Galaxy A51 features a little bit better camera than Moto G60s, although it has a lot less mega-pixels camera in the back, a worse 3840x2160 video definition and a smaller diafragm aperture which is not good for taking pictures and videos in poorly lited situations.
Moto G60s counts with a bit more memory to store more games and applications than Galaxy A51, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Moto G60s also has a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 1 TB. The Moto G60s has longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A51, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.