Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-04-29 |
| 6.68 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.48 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Iced Mint and Ink Blue | Prism cube black |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G95 MT6785V/CD chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2050 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MC4 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A51 5G has a score of 90.8, which is better than the Motorola Moto G60s's 79.9 global score. Both of these phones include the same Android 11 OS (operating system). Galaxy A51 5G's body is lighter and thinner than the Motorola Moto G60s. The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G counts with a bit more vivid screen than Moto G60s, because although it has a quite smaller display and a quite lower 1080 x 2400 resolution, it also counts with a quite better count of pixels in each inch of screen.
Moto G60s has just a bit bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Moto G60s also has an external SD slot that admits up to 1 TB. The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G features a bit superior processor than Moto G60s, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Galaxy A51 5G has a bit better camera than Moto G60s, although it has a back-facing camera with much less megapixels resolution, a smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for shooting photos and/or video in low light situations and a worse (4K) video definition. The Moto G60s has a little longer battery performance than Galaxy A51 5G, because it has an 11 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.