Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 12, 11 |
| -- | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.68 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.48 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Iced Mint and Ink Blue | -- |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G95 MT6785V/CD chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2050 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MC4 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 5G has a global score of 91.3, which is better than Moto G60s's score of 79.9. Both devices in this comparison review come with Android OS, but Galaxy A52 5G has a more recent 12 version and Moto G60s has Android 11, providing a couple nice extra features and improved performance. The Galaxy A52 5G construction is thinner and lighter than the Moto G60s.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G features just a little better hardware performance than Moto G60s, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also has a higher amount of RAM. Galaxy A52 5G has just a bit better looking screen than Moto G60s, because although it has a quite smaller screen and a bit worse 1080 x 2400 resolution, it also counts with a just a bit greater pixels number in each display inch.
The Galaxy A52 5G has a slightly better camera than Motorola Moto G60s, although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the same video frame rate and a 64 mega pixels resolution back camera. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G's memory capacity to store more games and applications is just as good as the Moto G60s one, they have an external memory card slot that holds up to 1 TB and exactly the same internal storage.
The Moto G60s features a little longer battery duration than Galaxy A52 5G, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.