Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11 |
| -- | 2021-09-01 |
| 6.68 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.48 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Iced Mint and Ink Blue | Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G95 MT6785V/CD chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2050 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MC4 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52s is much better than Motorola Moto G60s, having a 91.1 score against 79.9. The Samsung Galaxy A52s is a thinner and lighter cellphone than the Motorola Moto G60s. Both phones in this comparison review work with the same Android 11 operating system, so you shouldn't notice any difference regarding that.
Samsung Galaxy A52s features a little better hardware performance than Motorola Moto G60s, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy A52s also has 2 GB more RAM. Galaxy A52s counts with just a bit better screen than Moto G60s, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit more pixels per inch in the screen.
The Samsung Galaxy A52s has just a bit better camera than Motorola Moto G60s, although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for low light photos and videos, they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the same video frame rates and a same resolution camera. Galaxy A52s's storage for applications, games, photos and videos is very similar to Motorola Moto G60s's one, they have equal internal memory and an external memory card slot that supports up to 1 TB.
The Motorola Moto G60s has a little better battery lifetime than Galaxy A52s, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.