Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 92.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| -- | 2020-07-16 |
| 6.68 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.48 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Iced Mint and Ink Blue | Prism bricks black |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 395 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G95 MT6785V/CD chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2050 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MC4 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is much better than the Motorola Moto G60s, with a general score of 92.9 against 79.9. Both phones we are comparing here work with Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has older 10 version while Motorola Moto G60s has Android 11. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is a somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner cellphone than Motorola Moto G60s.
Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a bit sharper display than Motorola Moto G60s, although it has a little lower 1080 x 2400 resolution, a bit inferior count of pixels per inch in the display and a little bit smaller display. The Galaxy A71 5G UW has a little better hardware performance than Moto G60s, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also has more RAM.
Motorola Moto G60s features a little bit more storage to store more apps and games than Galaxy A71 5G UW, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage, the Motorola Moto G60s also has a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 1 TB. Galaxy A71 5G UW features a slightly better camera than Motorola Moto G60s, although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not nice for low light captures and video, they both have the same (4K) video definition, the same video frame rates and a same resolution back camera.
Motorola Moto G60s has a bit better battery lifetime than Galaxy A71 5G UW, because it has an 11% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.