Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 12 |
| -- | 2022-03-22 |
| 6.68 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 6.52 x 3.03 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.48 ounces | -- |
| Iced Mint and Ink Blue | Aqua Blue and Forest Green |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2408 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G95 MT6785V/CD chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2050 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MC4 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 11.22 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy F23 is just a bit better than Moto G60s, with a overall score of 84.6 against 79.9. Both phones in this review use Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy F23 has a more recent 12 version and Moto G60s has Android 11. The Galaxy F23 construction is incredibly lighter and thinner than the Moto G60s.
Samsung Galaxy F23 counts with a little sharper display than Moto G60s, because although it has a quite smaller display and a little bit worse 1080 x 2408 resolution, it also counts with a bit higher pixels count per inch in the display. Samsung Galaxy F23 has just a bit better hardware performance than Moto G60s. Both have a 4 GB RAM and 8 cpu cores.
The Motorola Moto G60s captures way better videos and photos than Galaxy F23, because it has a back-facing camera with a way higher resolution and a bigger camera aperture to capture better images and video in low light situations. The Moto G60s has much more storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy F23, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Moto G60s also has a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 1 TB.
Galaxy F23's battery duration is just as good as Moto G60s's battery duration.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.