Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.68 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.48 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Iced Mint and Ink Blue | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| -- | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G95 MT6785V/CD chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2050 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MC4 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Fold is a lot better than Moto G60s, with a 97.6 score against 79.9. Galaxy Fold's construction is extremely thinner but way heavier than Moto G60s. These phones come with Android operating system, but Galaxy Fold has a newer 9.0 Pie version and Moto G60s has Android 11, so it counts with a lot of extra features and performance optimizations.
The Galaxy Fold features a bit better processor than Moto G60s, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Fold also has 8 GB more RAM memory. Motorola Moto G60s and Galaxy Fold feature very similar displays, because although the Galaxy Fold has a little bit inferior quantity of pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a little bit larger display and a quite better 1536 x 2152 pixels resolution.
The Galaxy Fold features more storage for apps and games than Motorola Moto G60s, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 384 GB more internal memory. Moto G60s features just a bit longer battery life than Galaxy Fold, because it has a 14% more battery size. Moto G60s captures a bit better photos and videos than Galaxy Fold, because although it has slower 30 fps video frame rates and a tinier aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Moto G60s also counts with a camera in the back with lot more MP.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.