Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 85 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-06-18 |
| 6.68 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.48 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Iced Mint and Ink Blue | Midnight blue and Seawater blue |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G95 MT6785V/CD chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2050 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MC4 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy M40 is a little bit better than the Moto G60s, having an 85 score against 79.9. Both phones in this review have Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy M40 has the older 10 version while Moto G60s has Android 11 version. The Samsung Galaxy M40 construction is somewhat thinner and a lot lighter than Moto G60s.
Galaxy M40 has a little more vivid screen than Motorola Moto G60s, because although it has a quite smaller screen and a little worse 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a little bit better pixels density. The Samsung Galaxy M40 counts with a little faster processing unit than Motorola Moto G60s, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy M40 also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
Motorola Moto G60s has just a bit more memory capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy M40, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the Motorola Moto G60s also has a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB. The Moto G60s counts with a way better battery performance than Galaxy M40, because it has a 43% bigger battery size.
Moto G60s features just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy M40, and although they both have the same camera aperture, the same video definition and the same video frame rates, the Moto G60s also has a camera in the back with a much higher 64 megapixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.