Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| -- | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.68 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.48 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Iced Mint and Ink Blue | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 395 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G95 MT6785V/CD chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2050 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MC4 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 is better than the Moto G60s, with a 90.8 score against 79.9. Galaxy Note 20 is a somewhat thinner and a little lighter cellphone than Moto G60s. The Galaxy Note 20 features a little bit better looking screen than Moto G60s, although it has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2400, a little smaller display and a little bit lower pixel amount in each display inch.
Galaxy Note 20 counts with just a little better processing power than Motorola Moto G60s, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Note 20 also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Moto G60s features just a bit better camera than Galaxy Note 20, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Moto G60s also has faster 30 frames per second video frame rates, a bigger diafragm aperture and a lot higher resolution back facing camera.
The Moto G60s has a much greater storage capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy Note 20, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory, the Moto G60s also has a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB. Moto G60s features better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.