Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.68 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.48 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Iced Mint and Ink Blue | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G95 MT6785V/CD chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2050 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MC4 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a score of 98.9, which is way better than Motorola Moto G60s's 79.9 general score. These devices work with Android operating system, but Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a more recent 13 version while Motorola Moto G60s has Android 11, counting with lots of additional features. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra's construction is somewhat thinner and just a bit lighter than Motorola Moto G60s.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a little sharper screen than Moto G60s, because it has a higher 1440 x 3088px resolution, a greater screen density and a little bit bigger display. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a bit more powerful processor than Moto G60s, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has more RAM memory.
Moto G60s counts with just a bit bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Moto G60s also has a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB. Motorola Moto G60s features just a bit longer battery duration than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has an 11 percent greater battery size.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra takes a lot better photographs and videos than Motorola Moto G60s, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not good for low light photos and video, it also counts with a lot better video resolution and a lot higher resolution camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.