Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| -- | 2013-09-04 |
| 6.68 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.48 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Iced Mint and Ink Blue | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 265.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G95 MT6785V/CD chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2050 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G76 MC4 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 3 has a general score of 81.2, which is just a bit better than the Moto G60s's 79.9 overall score. The Galaxy Note 3 is a somewhat thinner and lighter phone than the Moto G60s. Both phones in our current comparison come with Android operating system, but the Galaxy Note 3 has the older 5.0 version while Moto G60s has Android 11 version.
Galaxy Note 3 features a better screen than Moto G60s, although it has a quite smaller display, a little bit worse pixel density and a little lower 1920 x 1080 pixels resolution. The Galaxy Note 3 counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than Moto G60s, because although it has less RAM memory and an inferior number of cores , it also counts with an extra graphics co-processor.
Motorola Moto G60s features a way bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because it has a SD memory slot that holds up to 1 TB and more internal memory capacity. Motorola Moto G60s counts with a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Motorola Moto G60s also has a lot bigger aperture to capture better images and videos in poorly lited environments and a way more megapixels back-facing camera.
The Moto G60s has a very superior battery lifetime than Galaxy Note 3, because it has a 56% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.