Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 5.1 |
| -- | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.68 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.48 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Iced Mint and Ink Blue | Black, Gold, Gray and White |
| -- | Glass; metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G95 MT6785V/CD chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2050 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MC4 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Moto G60s has an overall score of 79.9, which is a bit better than Galaxy Note 5's 79.3 global score. Both of these phones use Android OS (Operating System), but the Moto G60s has newer 11 version and Galaxy Note 5 has Android 5.1, offering some extra features and performance optimizations. Despite being the best we compare here, the Moto G60s is a somewhat heavier and a lot thicker cellphone than the Galaxy Note 5.
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 counts with a much better screen than Moto G60s, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better 2560 x 1440 resolution and a higher screen density. Moto G60s counts with a bit superior processor than Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM, the Moto G60s also has 7 more CPU cores.
The Motorola Moto G60s counts with a better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same video frame rates, the Motorola Moto G60s also has a much higher 64 mega pixels resolution back camera and a larger aperture. Motorola Moto G60s counts with a superior storage for games and applications than Galaxy Note 5, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and a SD card slot that allows up to 1 TB.
The Moto G60s counts with a superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has a 67 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.