Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| -- | 2019-08-23 |
| 6.68 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.48 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Iced Mint and Ink Blue | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 950.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G95 MT6785V/CD chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2050 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MC4 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note10 has a general score of 89, which is better than the Motorola Moto G60s's global score of 79.9. Galaxy Note10's construction is thinner and noticeably lighter than the Motorola Moto G60s. Samsung Galaxy Note10 has a little sharper screen than Motorola Moto G60s, because although it has a quite smaller display and a little lower resolution of 1080 x 2280 pixels, it also counts with a little bit better pixels amount per inch of display.
Galaxy Note10 features a bit better processor than Motorola Moto G60s, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy Note10 also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Moto G60s captures a bit better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because although it has slower 30 frames per second video frame rate and a tinier diafragm aperture which is not nice for low light photos and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Moto G60s also counts with a way higher 64 mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera.
Motorola Moto G60s has more memory to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that supports up to 1 TB. Moto G60s features a very superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.