Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| -- | 2014-09-29 |
| 6.68 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 6.04 x 3.09 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.48 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Iced Mint and Ink Blue | Black, Gold, Pink and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G95 MT6785V/CD chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2050 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 20 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MC4 GPU | Mali-T760 MP6 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 3.70 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3220mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Moto G60s is a bit better than Galaxy Note4, with a 79.9 score against 77.6. Despite being the best cellphone in this comparison, Moto G60s is a heavier and somewhat thicker cellphone than the Galaxy Note4. Moto G60s has a bit superior processing unit than Galaxy Note4, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Moto G60s also has 1 GB more RAM.
Galaxy Note4 has a little sharper screen than Motorola Moto G60s, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a quite better 1440 x 2560px resolution and a higher screen pixels density. The Moto G60s features a much better memory to store more games and applications than Galaxy Note4, because it has 96 GB more internal storage capacity and a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 1 TB.
Motorola Moto G60s counts with a much longer battery lifetime than Galaxy Note4, because it has a 55% more battery capacity. Motorola Moto G60s has a better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note4, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Motorola Moto G60s also has a back camera with a way better resolution and a way bigger diafragm aperture to take better low-light captures and video.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.