Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| -- | 2015-08-21 |
| 6.68 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.48 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Iced Mint and Ink Blue | Black sapphire, Gold platinum, Silver titan and White pearl |
| -- | Glass and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G95 MT6785V/CD chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2050 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MC4 GPU | Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note5 is slightly better than the Moto G60s, getting a score of 80.2 against 79.9. Samsung Galaxy Note5's design is way thinner and lighter than the Moto G60s. The Samsung Galaxy Note5 has a little bit better looking display than Moto G60s, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a greater display density.
The Motorola Moto G60s counts with a very superior storage capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Note5, because it has 64 GB more internal storage and a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 1 TB. Galaxy Note5 counts with a bit faster processor than Motorola Moto G60s. They have a 4 GB RAM memory and a Octa-Core CPU.
Moto G60s counts with a really longer battery life than Galaxy Note5, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. Moto G60s counts with a better camera than Galaxy Note5, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Moto G60s also has a back facing camera with a way higher 64 megapixels resolution and a larger aperture to take better captures and videos in low-light situations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.