Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| -- | 2016-08-02 |
| 6.68 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.48 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Iced Mint and Ink Blue | Black onyx, Blue coral, Gold platinum and Silver titanium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G95 MT6785V/CD chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2050 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MC4 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.22 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Moto G60s is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy Note7, having a global score of 79.9 against 79.5. Despite being the best we compare here, the Moto G60s construction is notably heavier and thicker than Samsung Galaxy Note7. Moto G60s counts with just a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy Note7, and although they both have the same RAM amount, the Moto G60s also has a greater number of cores.
The Samsung Galaxy Note7 has a little more vivid screen than Moto G60s, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and more pixels per screen inch. The Moto G60s has much more storage to install applications and games than Galaxy Note7, because it has 64 GB more internal memory capacity and a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB.
The Moto G60s takes much better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note7, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same diafragm aperture, the Moto G60s also has a back-facing camera with way more mega-pixels. Moto G60s has a much better battery duration than Galaxy Note7, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.