Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 83 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2017-09-15 |
| 6.68 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 6.40 x 2.94 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.48 ounces | 6.88 ounces |
| Iced Mint and Ink Blue | Deep Sea blue, Maple gold, Midnight black and Orchid gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 440.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G95 MT6785V/CD chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2050 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MC4 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note8 is just a bit better than Motorola Moto G60s, getting a global score of 83 against 79.9. The Galaxy Note8 is a thinner and just a little bit lighter phone than Motorola Moto G60s. These devices have Android operating system, but Galaxy Note8 has 9.0 Pie version while Motorola Moto G60s has Android 11 version, giving lots of additional features and a performance increase.
The Samsung Galaxy Note8 counts with a little sharper screen than Motorola Moto G60s, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2960px and a greater pixel density. Galaxy Note8 has a little bit better performance than Moto G60s, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy Note8 also has more RAM.
The Motorola Moto G60s features a much greater storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note8, because it has an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB and 64 GB more internal memory capacity. Moto G60s shoots much clearer pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note8, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the same 30 fps video frame rate and a F1.7 aperture, the Moto G60s also has a back camera with a way better resolution.
The Motorola Moto G60s counts with a way better battery lifetime than Galaxy Note8, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.