Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 88.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.68 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.48 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Iced Mint and Ink Blue | Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 281.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 551 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G95 MT6785V/CD chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2050 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MC4 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 has a global score of 88.3, which is much better than the Moto G60s's 79.9 global score. The Galaxy S10 is a thinner and much lighter phone than the Moto G60s. Both phones in our current comparison use the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so both of them should provide the user the same OS features.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 has a bit better processing unit than Moto G60s, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy S10 also has more RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy S10 has a sharper screen than Moto G60s, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 3040 pixels resolution and a better display pixel density.
The Moto G60s counts with a little bit better camera than Galaxy S10, because although it has worse video frame rate and a smaller aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Moto G60s also counts with a back camera with a much higher resolution. The Motorola Moto G60s counts with a bit more storage capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S10, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage, the Motorola Moto G60s also has a SD extension slot that supports up to 1 TB.
Moto G60s counts with a much better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S10, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 3400mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.