Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 93.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-05-16 |
| 6.68 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.48 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Iced Mint and Ink Blue | Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 342.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 502 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G95 MT6785V/CD chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2050 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MC4 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has a general score of 93.6, which is better than the Moto G60s's score of 79.9. These devices work with the same Android 11 operating system, so both of them should give you all the same operating system features. Samsung Galaxy S10 5G is a somewhat thinner and a bit lighter phone than Moto G60s.
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G counts with a little more vivid display than Motorola Moto G60s, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 3040 resolution and a higher number of pixels per inch of display. The Moto G60s counts with a quite bigger storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 1 TB.
The Galaxy S10 5G counts with a little faster CPU than Moto G60s, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy S10 5G also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Moto G60s features just a bit longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S10 5G, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. The Moto G60s has a slightly better camera than Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has lower 30 fps video frame rate and a smaller aperture which is not nice for low light images and video, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Moto G60s also counts with a way higher 64 mega-pixels resolution camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.