Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| -- | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.68 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.48 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| Iced Mint and Ink Blue | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G95 MT6785V/CD chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2050 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MC4 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10e is a little bit better than the Moto G60s, with an 86.3 score against 79.9. Galaxy S10e is a somewhat thinner and noticeably lighter device than Moto G60s. The Galaxy S10e counts with a little faster processing unit than Moto G60s, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy S10e also has a greater amount of RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy S10e counts with a bit better looking screen than Motorola Moto G60s, because although it has a quite lower 1080 x 2280 pixels resolution and a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a little higher screen pixels density. The Motorola Moto G60s counts with just a bit more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S10e, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Motorola Moto G60s also has a SD card slot that allows up to 1 TB.
The Motorola Moto G60s counts with a little bit better camera than Galaxy S10e, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is worse for low-light photos and video and worse video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Motorola Moto G60s also counts with a way more mega-pixels camera.
Motorola Moto G60s has a very superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because it has a 61% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.