Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 94.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.68 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.48 ounces | 5.78 ounces |
| Iced Mint and Ink Blue | Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 566 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G95 MT6785V/CD chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2050 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MC4 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 is better than the Moto G60s, getting a 94.8 score against 79.9. Both devices in this comparison include Android operating system, but Galaxy S20 has the newer 13 version and Moto G60s has Android 11, providing the user a couple nice extra features. Galaxy S20's construction is somewhat thinner and a lot lighter than Moto G60s.
The Galaxy S20 counts with a sharper display than Moto G60s, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 3200 pixels and a greater display pixels density. Moto G60s counts with a slightly better memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy S20, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Moto G60s also has a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 1 TB.
Galaxy S20 counts with a little better hardware performance than Motorola Moto G60s, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy S20 also has a greater amount of RAM. The Motorola Moto G60s counts with better battery lifetime than Galaxy S20, because it has a 25 percent larger battery size. The Motorola Moto G60s shoots clearer photos and videos than Galaxy S20, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Motorola Moto G60s also has higher 30 frames per second video frame rates, a larger diafragm aperture to take better low light photos and videos and a back-facing camera with a much better resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.