Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.68 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.48 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Iced Mint and Ink Blue | Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 509.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G95 MT6785V/CD chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2050 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MC4 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 FE is better than the Moto G60s, with a overall score of 90.8 against 79.9. The Galaxy S20 FE body is thinner and lighter than Moto G60s. Both devices we are comparing here use the same Android 11 OS (Operating System), so you shouldn't see any difference in that aspect. Samsung Galaxy S20 FE counts with a bit sharper display than Moto G60s, because although it has a little smaller display and a quite lower 1080 x 2400px resolution, it also counts with a bit higher pixel number per inch in the screen.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has a little bit better performance than Motorola Moto G60s, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE also has a greater amount of RAM. The Moto G60s has a little bit more memory capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S20 FE, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage, the Moto G60s also has a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 1 TB.
Moto G60s captures clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy S20 FE, because although it has lower 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Moto G60s also counts with a larger aperture to take better low-light photos and videos and a lot higher 64 mega-pixels resolution back camera.
Motorola Moto G60s counts with a little better battery lifetime than Galaxy S20 FE, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.