Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.68 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.48 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Iced Mint and Ink Blue | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G95 MT6785V/CD chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2050 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MC4 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is much better than Motorola Moto G60s, with a overall score of 98 against 79.9. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a just a little bit heavier but a little thinner phone than the Motorola Moto G60s. Both phones we are comparing work with Android operating system, but Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a newer 13 version while Motorola Moto G60s has Android 11 version, so it gives lots of additional features and some performance improvements.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a bit superior processing unit than Motorola Moto G60s, and although they both have 8 cores, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has 8 GB more RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a bit more vivid screen than Moto G60s, because it has more pixels per screen inch, a higher 1440 x 3200 pixels resolution and a bit larger display.
Motorola Moto G60s has a slightly better memory to install applications and games than Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Motorola Moto G60s also has a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 1 TB. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G's battery performance is very similar to the battery performance in Moto G60s.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a superior camera than Moto G60s, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not recommended for low-light photos and videos, it also counts with a much higher 7680x4320 video definition and a back-facing camera with way more MP.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.