Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 93.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 13, 12 |
| -- | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.68 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.48 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Iced Mint and Ink Blue | Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 799.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 422 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G95 MT6785V/CD chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2050 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MC4 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 is better than the Motorola Moto G60s, with a 93.4 score against 79.9. The Galaxy S22 is a noticeably lighter and noticeably thinner cellphone than Motorola Moto G60s. Both phones in this review have Android OS, but Galaxy S22 has the newer 13 version and Motorola Moto G60s has Android 11.
Samsung Galaxy S22 features a bit better hardware performance than Moto G60s, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy S22 also has a larger amount of RAM. The Galaxy S22 counts with a lot better looking screen than Moto G60s, because although it has a little smaller screen and a little lower 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a little better pixel density.
The Moto G60s features a much greater storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S22, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory, the Moto G60s also has a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 1 TB. Motorola Moto G60s counts with superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S22, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 3700mAh.
Samsung Galaxy S22 takes much clearer pictures and videos than Motorola Moto G60s, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for low-light images and a camera in the back with a much lower resolution, it also counts with a way better video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.