Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 13, 12 |
| -- | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.68 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.48 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Iced Mint and Ink Blue | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G95 MT6785V/CD chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2050 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MC4 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is better than the Motorola Moto G60s, having a 95.4 score against 79.9. These phones work with Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a newer 13 version while Motorola Moto G60s has Android 11, counting with some extra features and performance enhancements. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra body is just a bit thinner but just a little heavier than the Motorola Moto G60s.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a much more vibrant display than Motorola Moto G60s, and although they both have a display of the same size, the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a better pixel amount in each inch in the screen and a better resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels. Galaxy S22 Ultra features a bit superior CPU than Motorola Moto G60s, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra takes way better videos and photos than Moto G60s, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for capturing photos and video in low light situations, it also counts with a camera with a much better 108 mega-pixels resolution and a way higher video quality.
Moto G60s counts with a much bigger storage for apps and games than Galaxy S22 Ultra, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the Moto G60s also has a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB. Galaxy S22 Ultra's battery lifetime is just as good as the Moto G60s one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.