Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 4.4.2 |
| -- | 2014-06-23 |
| 6.68 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.48 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Iced Mint and Ink Blue | Blue and Red |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 432 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G95 MT6785V/CD chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2050 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G76 MC4 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 6.72 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.22 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | SIM |
| 6.6 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Moto G60s has a score of 79.9, which is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport's 77.8 general score. Both phones in this comparison review work with Android OS, but Motorola Moto G60s has 11 version while Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport has Android 4.4.2. Despite being the best cellphone we are comparing here, the Motorola Moto G60s is a way heavier and just a little bit thicker cellphone than the Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport.
Galaxy S5 Sport counts with a much better display than Moto G60s, because although it has a much smaller screen and a bit worse resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels, it also counts with a just a little greater pixel density. The Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport counts with a bit better performance than Moto G60s, because although it has less processing cores (although they are faster) and a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with a graphics processor.
The Moto G60s has a much better memory for games and applications than Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB and more internal storage. Moto G60s has a superior camera than Galaxy S5 Sport, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Moto G60s also has a back camera with a way better 64 MP resolution and a way larger diafragm aperture.
Motorola Moto G60s features a really longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.