Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 81.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| -- | 2017-04-21 |
| 6.68 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 5.86 x 2.68 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.48 ounces | 5.47 ounces |
| Iced Mint and Ink Blue | Arctic silver, Burgundy red, Coral blue, Maple gold, Midnight black, Orchid gray and Rose pink |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 173.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G95 MT6785V/CD chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2050 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MC4 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S8 has a global score of 81.7, which is a little bit better than the Moto G60s's score of 79.9. The Galaxy S8 is a thinner and much lighter cellphone than the Moto G60s. Samsung Galaxy S8 features a bit better performance than Motorola Moto G60s. They have 4 GB of RAM and the same number of cores.
Samsung Galaxy S8 counts with a much better looking screen than Moto G60s, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a greater pixel number in each inch in the display and a better resolution of 1440 x 2960. The Moto G60s counts with a superior camera than Galaxy S8, and although they both have a same size camera aperture, the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video resolution, the Moto G60s also has a back camera with way more mega-pixels.
The Motorola Moto G60s has much more storage for games and applications than Galaxy S8, because it has 128 GB internal storage and a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 1 TB. The Motorola Moto G60s features a way better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S8, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.