Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| -- | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.68 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 7.48 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Iced Mint and Ink Blue | Black |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | -- |
| 395 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G95 MT6785V/CD chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2050 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MC4 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.22 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro is slightly better than Motorola Moto G60s, with an 80.1 score against 79.9. These devices include Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy XCover FieldPro has 8.0 Oreo version while Motorola Moto G60s has Android 11. Despite being the best in this comparison review, Galaxy XCover FieldPro's body is incredibly thicker and heavier than Motorola Moto G60s.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a little faster processor than Motorola Moto G60s. Both have 4 GB of RAM memory and a Octa-Core CPU. The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a more vivid screen than Moto G60s, because although it has a much smaller display, it also counts with a better count of pixels per display inch and a slightly better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels.
The Moto G60s features a way better camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, it also counts with a lot better 3840x2160 video resolution and a camera with a way better resolution. The Motorola Moto G60s has a much bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB and more internal memory capacity.
The Moto G60s has just a bit longer battery performance than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has an 11% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.