Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.68 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.48 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Iced Mint and Ink Blue | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| -- | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G95 MT6785V/CD chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2050 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MC4 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a global score of 88.5, which is much better than Motorola Moto G60s's 79.9 overall score. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is a incredibly thinner and lighter cellphone than Motorola Moto G60s. Both phones we are comparing here include Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a newer 12 version while Motorola Moto G60s has Android 11, offering a couple additional features.
The Galaxy Z Flip has a little faster processing unit than Moto G60s, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Flip also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip counts with a bit sharper screen than Moto G60s, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2636 pixels and a little greater pixel density.
Moto G60s captures slightly better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has worse video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Moto G60s also counts with a larger aperture to take better low-light photography and videos and a camera with a much better 64 megapixels resolution.
Moto G60s counts with more memory for games and applications than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that allows up to 1 TB. The Moto G60s counts with a superior battery duration than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.