Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.68 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.48 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Iced Mint and Ink Blue | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| -- | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G95 MT6785V/CD chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2050 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MC4 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a general score of 92.3, which is much better than the Moto G60s's overall score of 79.9. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a much thinner and somewhat lighter cellphone than Moto G60s. Both devices in this review have the same Android 11 OS, so they should give you very similar OS features.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a little better processing power than Moto G60s, and although they both have 8 cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a little more vivid screen than Moto G60s, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better pixel density and a slightly higher 1080 x 2636 resolution.
The Moto G60s takes clearer photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has slower video frame rates, and they both have the same video resolution, the Moto G60s also counts with a back camera with lot more megapixels and a larger aperture for better photos and videos in low-light situations.
The Moto G60s features a better storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 1 TB. Moto G60s counts with a really longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.