Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.68 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.48 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Iced Mint and Ink Blue | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G95 MT6785V/CD chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2050 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MC4 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 is much better than Moto G60s, with a overall score of 94.6 against 79.9. Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a way heavier but thinner device than Moto G60s. Both of these phones work with the same Android 11 OS, so both should provide you identical OS features. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a slightly better looking screen than Moto G60s, because although it has a little worse display density, it also counts with a quite larger screen and a better resolution of 1768 x 2208.
The Moto G60s counts with a better memory for games and applications than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a SD extension slot that holds up to 1 TB. Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a bit better processing power than Motorola Moto G60s, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has 8 GB more RAM memory.
Motorola Moto G60s counts with a bit superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. The Moto G60s takes slightly better pictures and videos than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has worse 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Moto G60s also counts with a bigger aperture and a way better resolution camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.