Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 90.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11 |
| -- | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.68 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches |
| 7.48 ounces | 9.56 ounces |
| Iced Mint and Ink Blue | Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G95 MT6785V/CD chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2050 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MC4 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 11.22 | 7.7 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 3 is much better than the Moto G60s, getting a 90.6 score against 79.9. The Galaxy Z Fold 3 design is noticeably heavier but way thinner than the Moto G60s. Both of these devices include the same Android 11 OS (Operating System). Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 features a display that is very similar to the screen in Moto G60s, because although the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a just a bit lower display density, it also counts with a little larger screen and a better 1768 x 2208px resolution.
Galaxy Z Fold 3 features a bit more powerful processing unit than Motorola Moto G60s, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has 8 GB more RAM memory. Moto G60s features a better storage to install games and applications than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that admits up to 1 TB.
Moto G60s captures way better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a back facing camera with much more mega pixels and a lot bigger aperture. Moto G60s features a bit better battery performance than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a 14 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.