Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 11 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-08-20 |
| 6.68 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.48 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Iced Mint and Ink Blue | Carbon black, Glacier blue and Red flame |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 430 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G95 MT6785V/CD chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2050 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MC4 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has an overall score of 82.7, which is a bit better than Moto G60s's general score of 79.9. Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro's design is just a bit lighter and a bit thinner than Moto G60s. Both phones in this review use Android OS, but the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has 10 version while Moto G60s has Android 11.
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has a bit sharper display than Motorola Moto G60s, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a little more pixels per inch in the screen. Motorola Moto G60s has a way bigger storage for applications and games than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory, the Motorola Moto G60s also has a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 1 TB.
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has a little better hardware performance than Motorola Moto G60s, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro captures slightly better videos and photos than Moto G60s, although it has a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, a smaller aperture which is not favorable for low light images and a camera in the back with lot less MP.
The Motorola Moto G60s has improved battery performance than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.