Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 87.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| -- | 2020-05-12 |
| 6.68 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.48 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Iced Mint and Ink Blue | Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G95 MT6785V/CD chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2050 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MC4 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 12.98 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro is a bit better than the Moto G60s, having a overall score of 87.9 against 79.9. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro is a a bit heavier but just a bit thinner phone than Moto G60s. Both phones we are comparing include Android OS, but the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has the older 10 version while Moto G60s has Android 11.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features a little more vivid display than Motorola Moto G60s, although it has a little lower resolution of 1080 x 2400px, a bit lower pixel number in each inch in the display and a quite smaller screen. Moto G60s has a lot bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the Moto G60s also has a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 1 TB.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with a bit better CPU than Moto G60s, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM. The Moto G60s counts with a bit better battery performance than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 4700mAh.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a better camera than Moto G60s, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not so good for capturing images in low light situations, and they both have a same resolution camera, the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro also counts with a way better 7680x4320 video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.