Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| -- | 2020-05-05 |
| 6.68 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.48 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Iced Mint and Ink Blue | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G95 MT6785V/CD chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2050 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MC4 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is slightly better than Moto G60s, with a general score of 81.1 against 79.9. Both of these phones come with Android OS (operating system), but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has older 10 version while Moto G60s has Android 11. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro design is a little bit lighter and a little thinner than the Moto G60s.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a little faster CPU than Moto G60s, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has 2 GB more RAM memory. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a screen that is very similar to Moto G60s's screen, although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, a little bit smaller display and a little inferior pixels amount per display inch.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro captures a little bit better photos and videos than Moto G60s, although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for low-light photos and videos, they both have a back-facing camera with a 64 mega-pixels, the same (4K) video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate.
The Moto G60s has a very superior memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because it has a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 1 TB and more internal storage. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro and Moto G60s count with similar batteries performance, although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has 5020mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.