Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 70.9 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-02-07 | 2018-10-18 |
| 5.85 x 2.81 x 0.32 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Gold | Black, Pink and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 199.00 | $ 194.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1512 x 720 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 294 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 SDM632 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 250, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 XL is better than Moto G7 Play, getting a score of 80.7 against 70.9. Google Pixel 3 XL's body is just a little bit thinner but just a little bit heavier than the Moto G7 Play, and both were released with only a few months difference. The Google Pixel 3 XL features a much better display than Motorola Moto G7 Play, because it has a much better 1440 x 2960px resolution, a lot greater pixel density and a little bigger screen.
Google Pixel 3 XL has a bit better hardware performance than Moto G7 Play, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Google Pixel 3 XL also has 2 GB more RAM memory. The Moto G7 Play has a much bigger memory to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 3 XL, because although it has only 32 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
Google Pixel 3 XL counts with just a bit longer battery performance than Moto G7 Play, because it has a 14% larger battery size. Google Pixel 3 XL features a slightly better camera than Motorola Moto G7 Play, because although it has a less mega pixels resolution back-facing camera and a worse (4K) video definition, it also counts with a bigger aperture for better images and video in low-light situations and a bigger back camera sensor capturing better quality photos and videos.
The Google Pixel 3 XL not only is the best devices between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also cheap compared to the Moto G7 Play.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.