Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-02-07 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.18 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Blue and Red | Black, Gray and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5 inches |
| 2270 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.91 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel is a little bit better than Moto G7 Plus, with an 80.2 score against 76.1. The Google Pixel is a older and just a little thicker phone than Moto G7 Plus, but Google was able to make it somewhat lighter anyway. Google Pixel's processor is just as good as the processor in Motorola Moto G7 Plus, and although the Google Pixel has lesser CPU cores (but faster), they both have 4 GB of RAM.
Google Pixel counts with a bit sharper display than Moto G7 Plus, because although it has a little smaller screen and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 1920 pixels, it also counts with a bit more pixels per inch of display. The Moto G7 Plus has just a bit better camera than Google Pixel, because although it has a smaller back camera sensor taking less light and washed colors, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Moto G7 Plus also counts with a larger aperture to take better low light captures and video and a camera with a lot higher 16 MP resolution.
The Moto G7 Plus has a bigger storage for applications and games than Google Pixel, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. The Motorola Moto G7 Plus counts with a bit better battery performance than Google Pixel, because it has an 8% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.