Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-02-07 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.18 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Blue and Red | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2270 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 is a bit better than Moto G7 Plus, getting a score of 80 against 76.1. The Google Pixel 3 is a just a little bit thinner and lighter cellphone than the Moto G7 Plus, even though both were released only a couple of months apart. Google Pixel 3 counts with a bit sharper screen than Motorola Moto G7 Plus, because although it has a little bit lower 1080 x 2160 pixels resolution and a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little more pixels per screen inch.
Google Pixel 3 has a bit better hardware performance than Moto G7 Plus. They have 8 cpu cores and the same RAM memory amount. The Moto G7 Plus has a much bigger memory to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal storage capacity, the Moto G7 Plus also has a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
Moto G7 Plus counts with just a bit longer battery performance than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 3% larger battery size. Moto G7 Plus features a slightly better camera than Google Pixel 3, because although it has a smaller camera sensor taking less light and dull colors, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same (4K) video resolution, the Moto G7 Plus also counts with a back-facing camera with much more mega pixels and a bigger camera aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.