Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-02-07 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.18 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| Blue and Red | Black, Purple and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2270 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3a has a global score of 78.8, which is a little bit better than Moto G7 Plus's overall score of 76.1. Google Pixel 3a's construction is lighter and a bit thinner than the Moto G7 Plus, although both of them were released with only a couple months difference. Both of these phones use Android OS (operating system), but the Google Pixel 3a has a more recent 11 version while Moto G7 Plus has Android 10 version.
The Google Pixel 3a features a little more vivid display than Motorola Moto G7 Plus, because although it has a bit smaller display and a little lower 1080 x 2220 resolution, it also counts with a little better pixels density. Moto G7 Plus counts with a superior storage capacity to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory, the Moto G7 Plus also has a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
Google Pixel 3a counts with a bit better processing power than Motorola Moto G7 Plus. Both have the same RAM amount and 8 CPU cores. The Moto G7 Plus counts with a little bit better camera than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has a smaller sensor providing a lower image quality, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same video quality, the Moto G7 Plus also counts with a way higher resolution camera and a larger aperture to capture better photos in poorly lited situations.
The Google Pixel 3a counts with a battery performance that's very similar to the Motorola Moto G7 Plus one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.