Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-02-07 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.18 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Blue and Red | Black, Purple and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 167.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6 inches |
| 2270 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3a XL is slightly better than Moto G7 Plus, having a 78.9 score against 76.1. Both of these devices include Android OS (Operating System), but Google Pixel 3a XL has the newer 11 version and Moto G7 Plus has Android 10. Google Pixel 3a XL's design is just a bit thinner and a little lighter than Moto G7 Plus, even though both were released with only a few months difference.
Google Pixel 3a XL features a bit superior processing unit than Moto G7 Plus. Both of them have a Octa-Core processor and a 4 GB RAM. Google Pixel 3a XL counts with a screen that is just as good as the Moto G7 Plus one, although the Google Pixel 3a XL has a quite worse display density, a little bit smaller screen and a little bit worse 1080 x 2160px resolution.
Motorola Moto G7 Plus counts with a much bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the Motorola Moto G7 Plus also has a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 512 GB. Google Pixel 3a XL counts with better battery life than Motorola Moto G7 Plus, because it has a 23% more battery size.
Motorola Moto G7 Plus shoots just a bit better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 3a XL, because although it has a smaller sensor offering a lower image quality, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same video definition, the Motorola Moto G7 Plus also counts with a bigger aperture to take better captures and videos in low-light situations and a camera in the back with much more mega pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.