Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-02-07 | 2020-08-20 |
| 6.18 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Blue and Red | Just black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2270 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a has a score of 82.9, which is a bit better than Moto G7 Plus's general score of 76.1. Google Pixel 4a is a newer device, and it is also somewhat lighter and just a little bit thinner than Moto G7 Plus. Both phones we compare here work with Android OS (operating system), but the Google Pixel 4a has newer 11 version while Moto G7 Plus has Android 10 version, counting with some nice extra features and a performance increase.
Google Pixel 4a counts with a slightly better looking display than Moto G7 Plus, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a slightly better 1080 x 2340 resolution and a quite higher pixels density. The Google Pixel 4a features a little bit better performance than Moto G7 Plus, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Google Pixel 4a also has more RAM memory.
The Motorola Moto G7 Plus features a greater memory to install applications and games than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory slot that supports up to 512 GB. Google Pixel 4a features a little better battery performance than Motorola Moto G7 Plus, because it has 3140mAh of battery capacity.
The Moto G7 Plus has a slightly better camera than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a smaller back camera sensor taking lower quality pictures and videos, and they both have a same size camera aperture, the same (4K) video quality and the same video frame rate, the Moto G7 Plus also counts with a much more mega pixels camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.