Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-02-07 | 2020-11-19 |
| 6.18 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Blue and Red | Clearly white and Just black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2270 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a 5G has a general score of 87.5, which is better than the Moto G7 Plus's 76.1 global score. Google Pixel 4a 5G is a newer cellphone, and it's also a little thinner and a little bit lighter than the Moto G7 Plus. These phones have Android OS (operating system), but the Google Pixel 4a 5G has a newer 11 version while Moto G7 Plus has Android 10.
Google Pixel 4a 5G features a slightly better looking display than Moto G7 Plus, and although they both have a display with the same size, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also has a just a little higher pixel density and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2340px. Moto G7 Plus counts with a greater memory capacity for apps and games than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
Google Pixel 4a 5G has a little better hardware performance than Motorola Moto G7 Plus, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Google Pixel 4a 5G features a slightly better camera than Motorola Moto G7 Plus, because although it has a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a camera with a much worse 12.2 mega-pixels resolution, and they both have a F1.7 diafragm aperture, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also counts with a larger back camera sensor taking better quality photos.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with superior battery life than Moto G7 Plus, because it has a 30% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.